Harrys, I suppose you must know how a “law” works. A scientific law is established after years of tangible research, experiments, and observation. Any scientific theory goes through thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Yet, for some reason, so-called scholars of LOA are extremely sensitive to valid criticism. Abraham Hicks and people like her refuse to answer questions if it defies their claims.
In the end, you will believe what you want to believe. If you feel like you can move the other car from your preferred parking spot by mere 10 secs of prayer, feel free to try out all your ethos. (Again, I have also mentioned all the biases and flawed perceptions, giving us an illusion like manifestation) But no amount of hunch authorizes a claim into scientific law. And it makes LOA as credible as a Doctor without any proper certification.